The Lies I Told

By Dan Oshinsky on September 15, 2011 21 Comments

Dan Oshinsky is a 2011-12 Reynolds Fellow, and the founder of Stry, a news service launching in Spring 2012. Here on the RJI blog, Dan's putting himself inside the fishbowl to document a year in the life of a startup. Dan hopes that by being transparent with the process, others can learn from his successes, mistakes and failures.

I find myself quoting "Almost Famous" a lot. There's just something about the story of a young, trying-to-make-it-happen reporter struggling with the limitations of his own industry that just seems so.... relatable. Can't quite put my finger on it.

But there's a particular "Almost Famous" line that comes to mind right now. (Contrary to what colleagues might tell you, it is not, "I am a golden god.") It's the part of the movie where we've just met William, the reporter at the center of the film. He's backstage covering his first rock concert. He's talking with Kate Hudson's character. And she asks...

Penny Lane: How old are you?

William Miller: Eighteen.

Penny Lane: Me too! How old are we really?

William Miller: Seventeen.

Penny Lane: Me too!

William Miller: Actually, I'm sixteen.

Penny Lane: Me too. Isn't it funny? The truth just sounds different.

William Miller: I'm fifteen.

That William Miller and I -- we're not so different. For the past year, I have been talking about Stry. A lot. I have had conversations where I've been timid about it, and conversations where I've been overly enthusiastic about it, and conversations where I've just gotten totally lost in what I'm saying. And whenever the conversation gets too far away from me, I've found myself going to the one thing that feels safe:

Telling lies. Some big, some small, some petty. All lies.

And Miss Penny Lane was right: The truth just sounds different. It sounds... right. Perfect. It sounds like the vision I have for this company. It sounds like what I want it all to be.

Except that, of course, it isn't. Not yet. Stry isn't something I can just talk into existence.

Though I've been trying like hell.

I'd hope that other entrepreneurs won't make the same mistakes I've made. Don't lie. That's my unsolicited, kind-of-obvious advice. Go build something great and stand behind it. Actions > words.

But to come totally clean: these are among the lies I've told this year. They're the ones I can remember. There might be more, to be honest.

These are my confessions:

-We at Stry... This is the smallest of my lies. It's the subtlest. It's also the one I say most often.

When I'm talking about Stry, I use the word "we" a lot. We're optimistic about Stry's future. We reported from Biloxi. We're out at RJI. It's 'we' ad infinitum.

Except it's really just me. I founded this thing. I have not made any money off of it yet. I have lost some money because of it. But all of it -- the concept, the logo, the slogans, the words, the pictures, the dreams, the ambitions, the failures -- it's all me.

Now, I was down at the Poynter Institute in January, and I had a nice chat with Mark Briggs, a (successful) entrepreneur himself, about the use of the royal "we." He approved of "we." The consensus seemed to be that even at a one-man operation like Stry, the company was bigger than the individual. I wasn't speaking for myself. I was speaking for the company and all of its future employees/ambitions/etc.

But the more I use "we," the more it makes me uncomfortable. We? There is no we. Right now, there is only me.

This is the only lie I tell to make me feel like I'm not alone in this thing.

But it's not the truth. And moving forward, until I've got a real team behind this, I'm going to be the only one speaking for Stry.

-I'm an entrepreneur. This is technically true. But at this point, I think it's more accurate to say that I'm an inventor.

An entrepreneur is someone who creates a product and puts it into the field. But without product, I'm just a guy with an idea. And it's an idea that doesn't make me money just yet.

Yes, I founded this company. But what I really founded was the idea for the company. The mission statement for the company. The ambitions of the company.

Until I start selling stories, I'm no entrepreneur. Not if I'm being totally honest, at least.

-I've talked or am talking to media organizations about selling Stry content to them. I say this a lot. I'll be in a conversation about Stry, and I'll find myself saying, "Yeah, we've been in extensive conversations with news organizations about our product."

This is kind of true.

I have, in fact, had conversations -- most of them informal -- with higher-ups at news organizations. Not a ton. But some. The response, overall, has been positive.

But there have been no contracts signed -- just confirmation from certain news organizations that they're actually interested in Stry content, and that they might buy it whenever this thing becomes real.

But "extensive conversations"? That's some strong wording. And it's not reflective of where I've gone with Stry. This isn't a business yet -- it's an idea. Any conversations I've had with publishers have been focused on the idea, and how they think I should evolve it or pivot it to make it more marketable.

This is the only lie I ever tell when I want to sound cool. (It doesn't work, either.)

-I'm going back out the road soon. This is pants-on-fire untrue. I never tell news people this. It's just patently untrue. Any any reporter worth their Ticonderoga No. 2 would figure it out in a minute.

But this Spring, I'd be at my kitchen table, writing, and the plumber would be fixing the drain in the sink, and he'd ask me what I do. It'd be 11 a.m. on a Tuesday. I'd be in sweatpants. And I'd tell him about Stry, and I'd add in that I was going back out on the road soon.

Why would I lie to the plumber? Or, for that matter, the gas station attendant? Or the cashier at the bank?

There's just an awful feeling that I get when I tell someone who works legitimately hard that, yeah, my days are filled with writing and meetings and networking. Or sometimes, just updating a website while making a YouTube playlist. Or maybe even nothing at all.

And some days, as the keeper of this grand and great and ambitious idea that is Stry, I found myself telling the plumber that, yeah, I'm going back out on the road. It's my way of saying, Don't give me that look. It doesn't look like I'm doing much today. But I've got something big up ahead on the tracks.

This is the only lie I ever tell out of pure, unfiltered shame.

(I should say, though: I will be putting out other reporters on the road in 2012. That's a start.)

-I'm consulting with lawyers and CPAs. This is very much a half truth. One of the earliest pieces of advice I got was, Get a lawyer, get an accountant, and get the structure of your business figured out.

And I have, on occasion said, Well, I'm already on that.

Truth is, between Biloxi and RJI, I lived with my parents. (And to be unflinchingly honest: I actually enjoyed it.) My dad's a lawyer. Commercial law. Works on business deals. He also has a background in tax law. Having a bowl of Chex with the big guy and asking him about the legal structure for a non-profit isn't the same thing as sitting down with a real legal team.

Same goes for asking a question to my Uncle Jimmy (small business owner) or Uncle Tim (CPA). Doesn't count.

On that note...

-Yes, the paperwork is in motion. This is just a flat-out lie. I can't remember how many times I've said this. Truth is, I don't move very fast on certain things. Paperwork is one of those things. Last November, I had pretty much decided to file as a non-profit. My dad helped me register in the state of Maryland. All that was left were the federal forms. And.... they just refused to write themselves. Deadlines passed. I kept telling people the forms were in, or were about to be sent in.

They never seemed to send themselves in.

This was the only lie I told out of laziness.

And in the end: I ditched the non-profit route. I'm filed with the state of Maryland under Stry, LLC.

-I've been focus group testing the concept. A friend called me out on this one. (Thanks, LK. It deserved to be called out.) It started at the Online News Association conference in DC last fall. I had just introduced myself to David Cohn, one of last year's RJI fellows. He asked to interview me. And during the interview, I manage to tell him that before launching Stry, I had done some focus group testing on something or other.

I don't remember saying this. I've refused to re-watch the video to confirm exactly what I was allegedly focus group testing about. (Such is the nature of my shame.) But I know this: I did no such testing.

When I was launching Stry, did I consult a wide swatch of family, friends and professionals? Absolutely. I asked their opinions on the concept, on the name, on the logo.

But talking to a few dozen people isn't the same as focus group testing. Not even close.

Sorry about that one, David. Don't know where that came from.

-I'm Dan, Stry's senior bureau chief. This is the title on my business card. And, technically speaking, it is not a lie. I invented this company, and every entrepreneur I've talked to has said, Yeah, if you want to call yourself the Grand Poo-Bah of Underappreciated Entrepreneurial Journalism, that's your prerogative.

For reporting purposes, being the "bureau chief" was helpful. In Biloxi, people got confused when I introduced myself as the company's founder. "So why are you here?" they'd ask. "Shouldn't your reporters be here instead?" This title was a way around that question.

Of course, it freaked some sources out. It was misleading. And if you met my email signature before you met me, and then I walked in the room.... well, I got laughed at. Senior bureau chiefs are usually older than 23, I've learned. (Since Biloxi, I've turned 24, but you get the idea.)

-I know what happens next. Look: I have a vision for Stry. I know where I'm going. I know what we'll -- er, I'll -- be selling, and I know what the product should look like. I know what I want in a staff. I have all the big picture stuff sketched out -- talk to the lawyers, put a pilot bureau on the road, test the syndication process, sell publishers on Stry, raise the funds, launch this sucker -- but I don't know what's going to happen. I have hopes. I have dreams. And I have no idea what might become of me in the next eight months.

But I know this: I'm going to try to let my stories speak for themselves. From here on out, if I can't give the answer I want to give, I'm going to either have to:

A. Work harder to make it happen.
or, B. Get into a new line of business.

That's the truth.

0
Your rating: None

Comments

yes...

We do like ourselves, don't we Dan.

Thank you

Dan- That was my favorite thing you have ever written. The honesty was impressive. Thank you!

You're very welcome

Thanks, Rachel! I'm not sure if what I wrote would be considered "honesty" or "a massive display of full disclosure in blog form." Either way, it was definitely tough to write. Glad you enjoyed it.

Your lies

The only honorable thing to do is resign your fellowship.

My fellowship year ahead

@Darryl -- To rehash something I've said elsewhere on the web: When I pitched this fellowship to RJI, I said: Let's put me inside the fishbowl so others can watch Stry grow in real time. I told RJI I wanted to document everything -- my successes, my failures, my mistakes -- to help other entrepreneurs learn from what I've done.

RJI brought me here specifically because they wanted me to document my experience. And that means writing posts like this.

So this is me inside the fishbowl. It will be strange this year. It may be uncomfortable. Either way: Welcome to my year ahead.

Hope you keep reading along.

You're fine, Dan

Guess what, young Dan. The little exaggerations and dream-speech are such a huge part of the world of business-making these days that most people implicitly understand that what they're being told is 1/2 bullsh** or, to put it a nicer way, wishful thinking. The fact that at 20-whatever you've realized you don't like the way it makes you feel is just a post-modern rite of passage, in my opinion. Lots of us decide along the way to not go that route. Not our cup of tea, all that nonsense. Not all of us make our decision-making process as public as you just did. I am not going to commend you for it, exactly, because I don't think that's my place or anyone else's. Nor do I think it's anyone's place to condemn the dishonesty you just owned up in this blog post. That is ridiculous for reasons that I have outlined above: We all know that people who are building up to something big can get a little ahead of themselves when talking about what they've actually accomplished in the real world. I bet Henry Ford did that a time or two. What you just found out about yourself is that you actually have that think-big quality that can result in the occasional factual embroidery that is obviously NOT okay in the actual act of reporting/writing (separate thing, totally) but completely normal in the inventor/entrepreneur. Carry on, sir.

Thanks, Katherine

Kind words appreciated. My intent is obviously not to sully the good name of the University or RJI. Rather, once upon a time, I let my mouth get ahead of my business plan, and I'd like to ensure that others don't make the same mistake. I'm just trying to use my mistakes as the catalyst to start some discussion.

Carry on I will.

Building yourself with lies

I'm worried about the comment "We all know that people who are building up to something big can get a little ahead of themselves when talking about what they've actually accomplished in the real world." Regardless of the endeavor, when money or support is involved, lies like "I've been focus group testing the concept" is not an ethical form of self-promotion. I wonder how the other potential fellow hopefuls who were interviewed but didn't succeed would feel reading this.

Ah, the lies

@Sarah -- When I pitched this fellowship to RJI, I laid everything out for them. At no point did I mislead RJI with any of the things listed above. In fact, I specifically pointed out the mistakes I'd made in the early stages of Stry, and pitched RJI on the idea of using my experience as a springboard to start discussion around entrepreneural journalism.

In fact, it's specifically because of posts like this that RJI brought me on board.

And, of course, I'm here for one other big reason: RJI believes in Stry and the vision I've laid out for this company, and RJI wants to be a part of building it.

Hope that clears things up.

The video aint bad

Hey Dan - don't beat yourself up too much. In the video all you do is say that in focus group testing you found if you put the logo in a license plate people sound it out better (STRY as story). My guess - you did find that out by just asking a lot of different people (friends, family, plumbers). That might not be "focus group testing" in a scientific way - but it's not that far off either.

I admire the courage this post took. Now with the air cleared the most important thing is to make sure you find a way forward.

Thanks, David

First off, thanks for understanding, David. My apologies, again, to you and all those DigiDave readers.

You're spot on with your analysis. The license plate -- and the Stry mission statement -- both received a significant amount of scrutiny from family, friends, journalism folks, etc. I suppose what I was doing was more market research than focus group testing, the latter of which conjures up thoughts of a room with one-way mirrors and people getting free pizza to analyze certain pieces of data.

Anyway, onward I go.

(Also, now that I'm looking at what I've just written, I suppose I should avoid putting your name and the words "spot on" in the same sentence. Sorry about that.)

video

Where can I view this video? Is it available? I saw something yesterday on RJI's website that was a video of Dan but I didn't have time to view it. Is it still available or did RJI take it off?

Video in a link

Sarah - the video was never on RJI's site - it was on YouTube. Dan linked to it in the blog post above.

actually

I thought it was on the RJI 'Meet Dan Oshinsky' post. It's not there today.

Verbatim

About his logo of 'STRY,' Dan said: "We discovered that, in our focus group testing, that if you put it on a license plate people would sound it out like we wanted 'em to."

A scorecard of your 'lies'

Dan, as a Mizzou grad who has spent the last 20 years of my career working with entrepreneurs, start-ups and venture capital firms to help early-stage companies succeed, I thought I would scorecard your 'lies' against what I've heard (often knowing the truth) from more than 500 entrepreneurs trying to raise money or get customers.

I'll use a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the worst bald-faced lies, here is my assessment.

1. 'But the more I use "we," the more it makes me uncomfortable."

Score: 2

Yes, you are a company of one. However, you have been consulting friends and colleagues who are advising you, and likely some will be joining you at some point. So, I have little issue with the "we".

2. "An entrepreneur is someone who creates a product and puts it into the field."

Score: 2

While I stress that the top goal of founders should be to launch, because only markets validate ideas, not founders or advisors, I don't see an issue with this one. It's semantics, not a lie. Call yourself a founder if you're uncomfortable with 'entrepreneur',

3. "extensive conversations"

Score: 5

This is the area that trips up many founders, stretching the truth about customers and prospective customers. I don't like "extensive" but "conversations" is fine of course. And you are right that any hype about prospective customers does not work. One suggestion might be to use venture capital language like: "I am reaching out to news orgs to help me vet and validate the business model." You could go on to offer a project date when you intend to approach prospects with something to sell, and what you think the sales cycle will be until you begin to see revenue.

4. "I'm going back out the road soon"

Score: 2

Very little issue with this, especially the audience.

5. "I'm consulting with lawyers and CPAs"

Score: 3

My only issue with this is if it is in the process of trying to raise outside capital. Smart money bets on smart people who surround themselves with top talent willing to bet on the success of the founder. I am sure your family folks are great, but if you are trying to raise money, you might want different folks with more start-up stripes.

6. "Yes, the paperwork is in motion."

Score: 3

Same response as above, especially if the paperwork is critical for outsiders like investors or prospective employees.

7. "I've been focus group testing the concept"

Score: 5

Similar response to mine for "extensive conversations". I've had founders tell lies on a scale of 10 regarding outside validation of their concept. One example was an entrepreneur who said a major TV network had committed to a special about his healthy living innovation and what it could mean to society. I'd put you in the middle of the pack here.

Average Score: 3.14

Dan, in my view you are in pretty solid company with the best founders who have a shot at getting to market to test and tune your innovation for what markets, your customers and their customers, will tell you. If you were above 5 in my very informal scoring method, I would worry about key audiences or individuals either not buying the tenor or content of what you are saying, or worse yet, having you launch only to disappoint folks who bought more into what you had promised pre-launch.

good luck

3.14!

@Kim -- Thanks for the full scorecard! You seem to sum up the feelings of many in the entrepreneurial community: I shouldn't have been saying these lies, but they're not going to crush my business in the long run. I feel lucky to have had the chance to share my story and move on.

Right now, I'm obviously excited and focused on doing one thing: Building the team around me and bringing Stry to the marketplace.

Your 3.14

Dan,

Yes, I don't think your past instances are going to crush your business in the long run. That said, because you are at RJI, and because of the scrutiny of the journalism and strat comm industries around ethics, I would urge you to follow-up with another post very shortly that details how you have changed your language in portraying your business model and progress with all audiences.

Kim

The Blog Response

Yup, it's coming later this week.

Degrees

I stopped into Starbucks today to buy a large cappuccino. The line was nearly out the door. Having bought large cappuccinos from Starbucks in the past, I know the cost including tax is $4.14. The cashier charged me $3.77 including tax. I told the cashier that the cost of the large is usually $4.14 including tax. She looked over at the cup being used to make my drink, back at me, shrugged and gave me change, charging me $3.77. I thought about engaging in a discussion with the cashier over the $0.37 and the line which was now out the door. I took the change, my cappuccino and left. Did I steal? As defined in my Webster's -- Steal - "to take the property of another". This first definition doesn't deal with intent, doesn't address there being a line out the door or the amount of property taken. It doesn't soothe the soul by saying it is ok if you tried to not take the property or tried to give it back. Am I a thief? In my mind, the cashier clearly doesn't have the authority to give away Starbucks property. It made me think back to buying a Sunday New York Times for my father about 40 years ago. He gave me a couple of dollars to go in and buy the paper. The cashier charged me for a daily paper. I gave my dad the change. He questioned me on the amount of change and had me march back in and tell them they'd given me too much change and have them ring up the correct total. It was a wonderful lesson my dad taught me that day. Dan, take a look at yesterday's Wall Street Journal article by Sue Shellenbarger which ends with this quote "Mistakes are OK - hiding them is not." Congratulations for having the courage to address an ethical issue which I expect most would not be willing to discuss. I look forward to reading about STRY.

need new title

Love this post. Thrilled that young talent is even considering scaling this grease-covered pole. Good on ya.
Dude, lose the circa-1967 'bureau chief' title. You are a founder, a president, a principal.
Say so. Own it.

Add Your Comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Filtered words will be replaced with the filtered version of the word.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

You don't have to log in to leave a comment, but please leave your name.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.